Paid digital media & news disseminationRead disclosure
Accuracy after publication

Accuracy matters after the article goes live. Tell us when something needs attention.

See a company detail, figure, date or source issue that may be wrong? Send us the article and the supporting material, and we will review it against the published record.

Easy to reportSend the page link and the exact detail that needs attention.
Checked against the sourceWe compare the concern with filings, releases and other identifiable records.
Updated when neededConfirmed material errors are corrected on the published page.
Visible when it mattersMeaningful changes receive an updated timestamp or correction note.
We take factual concerns seriously

A company story should remain accurate after publication—not just on launch day.

Names, tickers, dates, figures and transaction terms can materially change how a company development is understood. When a client, reader or source identifies a possible issue, we review the article against the supporting record.

The goal is simple: correct what is wrong, preserve what is accurate and make material changes visible enough for readers to understand what was updated.

Send us the right information

Four details help us review your concern faster.

A specific request backed by a source is easier to assess than a general complaint and gives us a clearer path to a responsible update.

01

The page link

Send the exact article, archive page or newsroom URL that contains the detail you want reviewed.

02

The exact detail

Point to the sentence, figure, date, headline wording or company information you believe is inaccurate.

03

The supporting record

Include the filing, news release, exchange notice or other source that supports the requested change.

04

Your contact information

Leave the best email or phone number for follow-up if we need clarification before completing the review.

What happens after you contact us

From correction request to updated article.

We review the concern, compare it with the source and decide whether the page needs a minor fix, a material correction or no change.

  1. 01

    Review the request

    We open the article, identify the disputed detail and review the material you supplied.

  2. 02

    Compare the source

    The published wording is checked against the release, filing or other authoritative document connected to the story.

  3. 03

    Determine the impact

    We decide whether the issue is cosmetic or whether it changes the facts, timing, parties or meaning of the article.

  4. 04

    Correct the page

    When a change is warranted, the article wording and related publication details are updated.

  5. 05

    Show material changes

    Substantive corrections receive a visible note or updated modification time so the record remains clear.

01

What we can review

Factual statements, company names, tickers, dates, transaction terms, quoted figures, source attribution, headlines, labels and publication details can all be reviewed when a specific concern is raised.

Requests that simply disagree with accurate sourcing or that seek to remove truthful reporting without a factual basis may not result in a change.

02

Not every edit needs a correction note

Spelling, grammar and formatting may be fixed quietly when meaning does not change. When a revision changes how the story is understood, the update should be visible.

Material correction standardIf the change affects how a reader would understand the facts, timing, figures, parties or significance of the story, the page should reflect that change visibly.
04

When removal may be considered

Accurate coverage is not removed simply because it is inconvenient. Removal or retraction may be considered for legal obligations, privacy or safety issues, duplicate publication, invalid source material or a serious error that cannot be corrected responsibly.

Where practical, the newsroom may preserve a record that the article was removed or materially changed.

See something that needs attention?

Send the article, the exact issue and the source that supports the change.

The clearest correction requests include the page link, the disputed wording and the primary document that supports the requested update.

Sponsored coverage is held to the same factual standard. A commercial relationship does not prevent a company, reader or source from requesting a legitimate correction.

Email a correction request
Correction requestscornerstonemarketingbc@gmail.com

Use this route for factual errors, incorrect figures, source issues, labeling concerns or publication-detail corrections.

Related newsroom pagesStandards, contact and disclosure

Editorial standards
Newsroom contact
Important disclosure